On
October 4, 2013 a panel was held at the Woodrow Wilson International Center of
Scholars. The panel discussed the Mensalão trial in Brasil. On the panel: Oscar
Vihena, Peter Messitte, Marcelo Costenaro Cavali and Mathew Taylor. The trial
is the largest on political corruption in Brasil's history. As this case
involves 25 high profile public officials in Brasil's parliament. The case
itself has lasted for nearly nine to ten years, and is not close to a
definitive conclusion. While everyone involved has been convicted; 12 of the
convicted are having their cases
reviewed. Creating controversy and scrutiny of Brasil's legal system.

Oscar Vihena was the first speaker on the panel. While he
was speaking he made a few points regarding the nature of this case. Brasil's
Supreme Court takes criminal cases involving high profile and ranking officials
in Brasil. The Supreme court makes public decisions since 1994, which are
usually televised for the public to follow. Peter Messitte emphasizes the
difference between the judicial system in Brasil in relation to the United
States. He compares the two Supreme courts where in the US the Supreme court does not make public
decisions and does not have jurisdiction over criminal cases therefore do not
have trials regarding criminal cases. Marcelo Costenaro Cavali mentioned that
the result of the case does not matter much due to corruption within the
criminal justice system itself. Mathew Taylor from there explains how the Mensalão
trial is the exception to the rule in Brasil. Mentioning the fact that in the
last 10 years of the case less than 6 percent of the accused have been
convicted. Brasil still faces Issues of transparency and accountability. Also
due to the statute of limitation laws
often many cases regarding corruption have not been addressed. The question of media's role on the case, was discussed, but there was not enough time to dissect the issue.
With all
of this information where does this leave Brasil's populace? Keeping in mind
with our
overarching question this case in Brasil became high profile due to
the increase of media use. Noticing that throughout the panel there was
controversy surrounding the televising of high profile cases in the criminal
justice system. Media itself can play a role in these cases. In the Mensalão
corruption scandal media's role in informing the public in Brasil has created a
space in civil society where citizens are now aware of the actions of their
elected officials. Corruption is not new to Brasilian politics and so
understanding the media's role as a catalyst for the public to speak out
against it is crucial. It is crucial for Brasil's continued economic growth and
future policy reform. This can be seen today with anti-corruption protests; the
public is actively becoming more involved and vocal about policy reform in
Brasil.
No comments:
Post a Comment